Exploring the Limitations of BMI as a Health Assessment Tool

Introduction

When visiting a doctor, one of the first measurements taken to assess overall health is body mass index (BMI). Healthcare providers widely use this simple metric, derived from height and weight, to put individuals into weight groups. These groups include “Underweight,” “Normal,” “Overweight,” and “Obese.” However, the application of BMI as a health assessment tool has its limitations. This article delves into a discussion about BMI, its calculation, interpretation, and the various factors that affect its accuracy. We explore the complexities and shortcomings of relying solely on BMI for health evaluation. From differences in body shape and composition to gender, self-image, race, ethnicity, and even caloric burn estimations.

Background on BMI

In The Doctor’s Office

When someone visits a doctor, they usually undergo basic tests to assess general health. Tests usually begin with taking off shoes to measure weight on a scale and height against a wall or stadiometer. The intersection of weight and height is then often located on a colorful wall chart which shows the Body Mass Index (BMI). Chart 1 below shows a standard BMI diagram where weight is on the x-axis and height is on the y-axis. For example, someone who is 6 feet tall and weighs 180 lbs has a BMI of about 24.

Chart 1. Body Mass Index (BMI)

BMI Calculation

Body fat percentage (BFP) can be easily estimated using BMI in the doctor’s office, at home, or effectively anywhere a scale is available because it is a simple equation. As shown in Figure 1, it is simply the quotient of [ Weight in Kilograms ] over [ Height in Meters Squared ]. Since the weight denominator has an exponent, this causes the BMI chart to take on a slight curvature as shown in the previous chart. From our previous example, the calculation of BMI for someone who is 6 feet tall and weighs 180 lbs is given by: 1) first converting weight into kilograms: 180 lbs x [ 2.20 kilograms/pound] = 81.6 kilograms, 2) then converting height into meters: 6 feet x [ 3.28 feet/meter] = 1.83 meters, then 3) plugging the values into the formula BMI = 81.6 / 1.83² = 24.

Why Use BMI?

Healthcare professionals measure BMI because it offers a quick estimate of an individual’s BFP. Healthcare professionals commonly use BMI to assess the deviation of someone’s weight from what is considered normal for their height. Excess or deficient weight may result from body fat (adipose tissue), or the lack thereof. However, other factors such as muscularity also significantly affect BMI. BMI is used to categorize people into broad weight groupings such as “Underweight”, “Normal”, “Overweight”, and “Obese.”

In this article, we stress the use of quotations for weight categories, such as “Normal”. We do this because of the many limitations of BMI and the many differences in body shape and composition. As shown in the table below each weight category has a range of BMI values. For example, anyone with a BMI above 25 is considered “Overweight” or “Obese”. In contrast, anywhere between 18.5 to 24.9 is in the “Normal” range. Note that the weight categories correspond to the colored areas in the Chart above. For example, “Normal” is shown in green, and “Overweight” is shown in yellow.

Interpretations of BMI

BMI weight categories allow people to be assessed for having a higher or lower risk of various health problems. These problems include anorexia, pre-diabetes, and fatty liver disease. Because its calculation is so rudimentary, any diagnosis is typically supported by other tests such as blood work. Nevertheless, there is evidence of a strong correlation between BMI and various health problems. For example, Chart 2 below shows percentages of U.S. adults reporting a family history of diabetes. People classified as “Obese”, with a BMI greater than 30, reported a family history of diabetes at 37.5%. This is almost twice as high as the 22.6% rate of people who were classified as having a “Healthy weight”.

BMI Alternatives

BMI is only one method to estimate BFP. While it can be quickly measured, it is generally considered to be the least accurate. Other methods can be more accurate, but aside from using skinfold calipers are time-consuming and expensive to perform. The alternatives to BMI include:

Limitations of BMI

BMI is only a very rough estimate of body fat percentage. There are many limitations to its calculation and interpretation. Regarding calculation, the simplicity of the formula is that it requires only two variables (height and weight). However, this also means that it is unable to capture the many differences in body shape and body composition. Our composition in terms of fat, bone, muscle, etc. make each of us unique individuals. Therefore, BMI is best interpreted as a generic, average calculation. Categorizing people based on BMI and assessing health conditions based on those categories is also an application of statistical averages. There are measurable factors that can place an individual outside of these averages such as stature and body composition. Gender, self-image, race, ethnicity, and their intersectionality, can be problematic with BMI.

BMI and Body Shape

The BMI calculation has limitations particularly when applied to individuals with short or tall stature. The BMI equation accounts for only height and weight, disregarding other crucial factors such as body composition and distribution of muscle and fat. For individuals with shorter stature, BMI may overestimate their level of body fat, as shorter individuals tend to have more compact body proportions. Conversely, BMI may underestimate in terms of body fat for tall individuals, as their height can artificially lower their BMI. It is essential to consider these limitations when interpreting BMI results for individuals with extreme heights to ensure a comprehensive understanding of their overall health and body composition. Consulting with a healthcare professional who can assess various factors beyond BMI is advisable for a more accurate evaluation of health and well-being.

BMI and Body Composition

It is also important to recognize the limitations of BMI when applied to individuals with either low or high lean body mass. Lean body mass includes muscle mass, as well as bones and bodily fluid. The BMI equation considers only height and weight, disregarding important factors like body composition and distribution of muscle and fat. Individuals with high lean body mass, such as athletes or bodybuilders, may have greater muscle mass, which can result in a higher BMI that does not necessarily indicate a higher level of body fat. On the other hand, individuals with low lean body mass, such as older adults or those with certain health conditions, may have less muscle mass, leading to a lower BMI that may not accurately reflect their level of body fat.

It is important to understand that BMI alone may not provide a comprehensive assessment of health for individuals with extreme variations in lean body mass. We recommend consulting with a healthcare professional who considers multiple factors beyond BMI to obtain a more accurate evaluation of overall health and body composition.

BMI and Gender

There are limitations to BMI when it comes to considering gender differences as well. The BMI equation considers only height and weight, disregarding other crucial factors such as body composition and fat distribution, which can vary between genders. For example, women generally tend to have a higher proportion of body fat compared to men. Consequently, the BMI may underestimate body fat in women, as it does not specifically consider these gender-specific differences. Additionally, women may experience changes in body composition due to factors such as pregnancy or hormonal fluctuations, which further complicate the accuracy of BMI measurements. It is essential to recognize that BMI alone may not provide a complete picture of an individual’s health, especially when considering gender differences. Consulting with a healthcare professional who can assess multiple factors beyond BMI is advisable for a more accurate evaluation of health and well-being, and one that considers gender-specific considerations.

BMI and Self-Image

While someone may be classified into a particular BMI category, they may not agree with the categorization and self-identify differently. The blunt nature of the terms “Normal”, “Overweight”, and “Obese” often communicate inaccurate and unpalatable, if not damaging, connotations. Body shaming is a rampant problem in the United States, likely amplified by the various diet crazes of the past few decades as well as pop culture. Social media has also had an enormous impact by infusing viewers with favored body shapes. This appears to be especially true for women, but also for men and children.

Strong messages of ‘you are not okay unless you look this way’ batter people because of shame-inducing BMI classifications and the promotion of and desire for idyllic body images. This is surely taking a psychological and emotional toll on many. Perhaps leaving BMI in the realm of the doctor’s office is advisable, but even then, when a doctor defines a patient based on a BMI category, their position as an authoritative medical expert can have a significant impact on self-image and body satisfaction.

Race and Ethnicity

Because researchers primarily developed BMI using data from Caucasian populations, people have questioned its applicability to diverse ethnic and cultural groups. BMI may not accurately capture variations in body composition, bone density, and genetic factors that influence health risks among different ethnic groups. There is mounting evidence from studies on various demographics that proves this to be the case. Studies have shown the need for alternative BMI ranges for Asians, Europeans, and people of African descent. As a result, the interpretation of BMI can result in inaccuracies when assessing health risks and weight-related implications, undermining its applicability as a universal metric. Recognizing the importance of inclusive and culturally sensitive approaches to health assessment, it becomes imperative to consider additional factors beyond BMI to ensure a comprehensive understanding of an individual’s health status, particularly when examining individuals from diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds.

BMI and Basal Metabolic Rate

Nearly all weight management technologies rely on estimating caloric burn by first calculating Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR) using simplified formulas that are dependent on only four variables: height, weight, age, and gender. The Original Harris-Benedict Equations (published in 1919), the Revised Harris-Benedict Equations (published in 1984), and the Mifflin St Jeor Equation (introduced in 1990) all demonstrate this. The Katch McArdle Equation (introduced in 2006) simplified the calculation further to using only weight and body fat percentage (BFP). However, technologies using this latest equation generally employ BMI to estimate BFP, making it reliant only on height and weight as well. Therefore, the calculation passes all the problems discussed in this article relating to stature, body composition, gender, race, and ethnicity, diminishing the accuracy of the BMR calculation.

BMI, Caloric Burn, and Weight Management

Caloric Burn is essential to understanding weight management. For example, people generally consider achieving a caloric deficit, where they burn more calories than they consume, as a prerequisite for weight loss. To calculate total calories burned, technologies begin with BMR, which measures caloric burn when at complete rest. To estimate the total caloric burn of an individual during the day, most technologies simply multiply by a static constant to reflect a person’s lifestyle. For example, the general rule of thumb is to multiply BMR by 1.2 to estimate the total daily calories burned for someone with a sedentary lifestyle. These static constants introduce additional problems themselves because they do not adjust for each individual and, also, further exacerbate the errors inherent in the underlying BMR estimate.

We recommend using alternative formulas and methods to provide more accurate estimates of calories burned. One such example is True Burn™, introduced by The Difference weight management app. The proprietary True Burn™ formula utilizes artificial intelligence machine learning. It provides users with a personalized estimate of total calories burned. The formula calibrates to each user’s data and does not depend on height, weight, or BMI.

Conclusion

Healthcare providers widely use Body Mass Index (BMI) as a method to estimate Body Fat Percentage (BFP) and classify individuals into different weight categories, but it is important to acknowledge the several limitations of this approach. The simplicity of the BMI formula, which only considers height and weight, fails to capture the complexities of body shape and composition, including factors such as bone density, muscle mass, and fat distribution. Moreover, BMI does not consider variations in body composition and health risks among different ethnic and cultural groups, as researchers primarily developed it using data from Caucasian populations. This lack of inclusivity undermines the applicability of BMI as a universal metric.

Furthermore, BMI can significantly impact self-image and body satisfaction, perpetuating body shaming and unrealistic ideals. Additionally, when using BMI to estimate caloric burn and support weight management, it introduces other inaccuracies and diminishes the precision of the Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR) calculation. Therefore, it is crucial to recognize the limitations of BMI and consider alternative methods and formulas that provide more accurate assessments of body composition, health risks, and caloric burn, considering individual factors such as gender, race, ethnicity, and lifestyle.

What do you think? Please leave your comments below.

Click here to find out more about The Difference App.

Please email us at Info@TheDifferenceApp.com for more information or join our mailing list.